🔗 Share this article

In contemporary Britain, protest is no longer a basic freedom. Instead, it has become a conditional permission that authorities allow or deny as they see fit. This represents the underlying meaning of new regulations that the ruling administration is advancing, which would dictate the timing and location protests can occur, with potential imprisonment for those who disobey these restrictions.

Gradual Weakening of Civil Liberties

Previous administrations had already undermined this essential right: the former Conservative government had granted law enforcement sweeping additional powers, which international human rights organizations had condemned as "significant and unjustified limitations" on civil liberties. Collectively, these incremental assaults on liberty have practically eliminated the historically earned right to public demonstration.

Using Atrocity to Justify Crackdown

The latest restrictive measures are being defended by citing last week's heinous antisemitic attack on a Manchester Islamic center. There should be universal agreement that the safety of British Jews must be safeguarded. However, using this horrific incident as a justification to suppress opposition is not only unrelated to that duty but perverts it.

"When you cannot draw the line at mass killing, you probably cannot draw the line at democratic principles," commented a well-known American author, a statement that applies equally for the present administration.

Historical Context of Demonstration

Reflect on Britain's rich history of protest and activism against racism and authoritarianism, from the historic 1936 Cable Street confrontation to postwar Jewish anti-fascist movements and the 1970s demonstrations against the far-right organization. Many of these early protesters were labeled as radicals in their era, even while they were fighting for the freedoms of marginalized groups.

Current Reality

In the current complicated landscape, here's what's actually happening: The Israeli government – a sovereign nation – is perpetrating acts that international bodies have characterized as genocide. Its military actions have led the global justice body to release arrest warrants against Benjamin Netanyahu and his former defense minister.

International public opinion has changed significantly against Israel's violent actions. In Britain, a large percentage of citizens believe Israel has probably committed international law violations. Most people would support a complete ban on arms sales to the state, and approve the detention of the Israeli leader.

Suppressing Opposition

Having essentially lost the public debate, Israel's supporters are now seizing on a vile antisemitic crime to attempt to suppress a mass movement against a ethical disaster. The British government appears to be included in this attempt. Government officials have not enacted extensive restrictions on Israel and have allowed arms exports to continue.

People who are demonstrating against the erasure of Gaza have been labeled as dangerous radicals. Yet there's a significant reason why there hasn't been a more extensive crackdown on these demonstrators until now: extremely few protesters have made truly offensive statements about Jewish people, giving police authorities minimal reason to take action.

Dangerous Conflation

Merging Jewish heritage with the actions of the Israeli state is not only manipulative but also dangerous. The official definition of antisemitism, accepted by the British government and many organizations, has been appropriately questioned for potentially restricting legitimate criticism of Israel. However, there should be universal agreement about one of its central illustrations: that "holding Jewish people generally accountable for actions of the state of Israel" constitutes antisemitism.

Escalating Restrictions

This is why we've arrived at a situation where police authorities can propose that demonstrations criticizing Israel's policies should be canceled because they might "accidentally or intentionally" support antisemitism. Similarly, political figures have stated that recognition of Palestinian statehood has made political parties "implicated" in alleged abuse faced by Jewish communities.

Inconsistent Treatment

On the same day as the religious center assault, the Israeli military killed numerous of Palestinians in Gaza – adding to the terrible count from two years of ongoing violence that have claimed many thousands of human lives. British political leaders and media outlets have hardly hidden the minimal importance they assign to Palestinian life. This represents one of the most brazen demonstrations of racism in our time.

Breaking Boundaries

Our government has already passed a dangerous boundary by proscribing a specific activist group, a non-violent, human rights-focused activist collective. Multiple thousands of British demonstrators have been arrested, mostly for carrying placards against genocide and supporting the proscribed group. Many of those arrested are elderly citizens; including a former clergyman and the daughter of a Holocaust survivor.

International Parallels

It's easy to see where this trajectory leads. In the United States, government officials helped demonize pro-Palestinian protests: a ex-political leader implied that some were "connected to" foreign governments, while the current president characterized such demonstrations as antisemitic. In taking these actions, they helped legitimize the authoritarian crackdown on such protests – and on free speech in general.

Future Concerns

If a hard-right government comes to power, it would be granted extensive authority to control opposition. What might a new administration do with this repressive toolkit? Our ancestors struggled, endured hardship and died to secure our freedoms. We may ultimately regret how easily we permitted them to slip away.